Indicates the validity of the 3D modeling approach applied in the present study. It was found that the deviation was less than 1 cm, which To verify the average model’s size and shape, the girth measurements of the samplesįor each body type were averaged, and the results were compared with those of theģD average body shape. A Grasshopper algorithm was formulated toĪutomatically execute all procedures that had to be repeatedly performed. Grids and intersection points (3) Generate an average 3D model in a position thatĬorresponds to the average coordinates of the intersection points (vertex coordinates) Reference lines and six vertical reference lines (2) Create horizontal and vertical line The main reference lines on the 3D-scanned lower bodies, including six horizontal ToĮxecute the automated process of generating an average 3D model of their lower bodies in a step-by-step manner, the following procedures were performed: (1) Determine (normal, overweight, and obese), and selected seven samples in each body type. First, we categorized men aged 36 to 55 years included in SizeUSA 3D data into the three body types Rhinoceros 3D® (Rhino) and Grasshopper as an algorithm editor. Human body according to body types using both NUBRS-based modeling software The aim of this study is to develop an automated process for modeling average 3D
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |